John Brett. Portrait of Christina Rossetti. 1857.
Authors
Our search buttons on the right offer to sort by "Author or Creator." By "creators," we mean not simply authors of texts (criticism, poetry, essays, books), but also editors, publishers, painters, engravers, and even architects. Sometimes pictures of the latters' buildings were engraved as plates in literary annuals. This page will automatically give you creators listed alphabetically by type. You may limit or further organize your search, if you wish, using buttons on the right. Anonymous productions appear at the end of this list.
Barbauld, Mrs. (Anna Letitia), 1743-1825
1
Barbauld, Mrs. (Anna Letitia), 1743-1825, "Preliminary Essay." in Selections from the Spectator, Tatler, Guardian, and
Freeholder (London, UK:
Preliminary Essay to the Selections from the
Spectator
Anna Letitia Barbauld
Editor
Mary A. Waters
Editing and Encoding assistance
Rachel Dejmal
BarbSpectatorPrelim1804
The Criticism Archive
Edited by
Mary A. Waters
http://www.poetessarchive.org/criticism/index.html
Preliminary Essay
Barbauld, Mrs. (Anna Letitia), 1743-1825
Selections from the Spectator, Tatler, Guardian, and
Freeholder
with a Preliminary Esssay, by Anna Lætitia Barbauld
Barbauld, Mrs. (Anna Letitia), 1743-1825
London, UK
J. Johnson
1804
i-xxxiv
All quotation marks and apostrophes have been typed on the U.S. keyboard.
Quotation marks that indicate block quotes have been silently eliminated.
Any dashes occurring in line breaks have been removed.
All hyphens have been typed on the U.S. keyboard.
em-dashes have been recorded originally using the —
Long "s" (ſ) has been silently modernized.
Page numbers appear at the beginning of each page, no matter where originally
placed.
Compositors' catchwords and running titles have been silently eliminated.
Spelling has not been regularized.
& has been used for the ampersand sign.
All other characters, those with accents, non-breaking spaces, etc., have been
typed on the U.S. keyboard.
Writing in other hands appearing on these manuscripts has been indicated as such,
the content recorded in brackets.
text-indent: 10px; display: block;
text-indent: 20px; display: block;
text-indent: 30px; display: block;
text-indent: 40px; display: block;
text-indent: 50px; display: block;
text-indent: 60px; display: block;
text-indent: 70px; display: block;
text-indent: 80px; display: block;
text-indent: 90px; display: block;
text-indent: 100px; display: block;
text-indent: 110px; display:
block;
text-indent: 120px; display:
block;
text-indent: 130px; display:
block;
text-indent: 140px; display:
block;
text-indent: 150px; display:
block;
text-indent: 160px; display:
block;
text-indent: 210px; display:
block;
text-indent: 260px; display:
block;
text-indent: 310px; display:
block;
Full Text or Citation
full text
citation only
Primary or Secondary
primary
secondary
Genre and Material Form
pageimage
biography
biographical essay
poetry pamphlet
poetry book
poem
story
drama
table of contents
table of illustrations
picture
index
notes
frontispiece
inscription page
book boards
titlepage
preface
advertisement
foreword
acknowledgments
collection literary annual
collection miscellany
collection anthology
collection beauties
collection juvenile
collection religious
collection travels
mixed
essay
review
letter
fragment poem
fragment story
fragment novel
literary criticism book
literary criticism collection
bibliography
engraving
reproduction
figure
graph
map
table
musical score
music
satire
political pamphlet
political cartoon
periodical
historical monograph
historical essay
philosophical treatise
philosophical essay
religious pamphlet
sermon
theology
religious book
essay on education
educational treatise
list of subscribers
allegory
introduction
slipcase
dedication
picture of building
floorplans
photograph
translation
manuscript
printersmark
literary criticism article
Library of Congress Subject Headings, reduced to one word before
hyphen
ARC Genre Categories, July 1, 2017
Advertisement
Animation
Bibliography
Catalog
Chronology
Citation
Collection
Correspondence
Criticism
Drama
Ephemera
Essay
Fiction
Film, Documentary
Film, Experimental
Film, Narrative
Film, Other
Historiography
Interview
Life Writing
Liturgy
Musical Analysis
Music, Other
Musical Work
Musical Score
Nonficition
Paratext
Performance
Philosophy
Photograph
Political Statement
Poetry
Religion
Reference Works
Review
Scripture
Sermon
Speech
Translation
Travel Writing
Unspecified
Visual Art
ARC Format Categories, July 1, 2017
Codex
Collection
Dataset
Drawing
Illustration
Interactive Resource
Manuscript
Map
Moving Image
Notated Music
Page Proofs
Pamphlet
Periodical
Physcial Object
Roll
Sheet
Sound
Still Image
Typescript
Addison, Joseph, 1672-1719
Steele, Richard, Sir, 1672-1729
English literature
History
Changed by
Laura Mandell
had to roll back due to xml versioning error, revisions as below but starting
with August and March 2021 XML
Changed by
Laura Mandell
Added header teiHeader07232021.xml
changed milestone sig to fw sig
inserted line break before fw
Changed by
Laura Mandell
Added full text taxonomy using "changeHeaderCritArc2.xsl"
Changed by
Mary A. Waters
changed file name
minor TEI encoding revision
Changed by
Laura Mandell
Added new taxonomies into headers using 'changeHeaderCritArc.xsl'
Changed by
Mary A. Waters
TEI encoding revision
Changed by
Rachel Dejmal
TEI encoding revisions
Changed by
Mary A. Waters
TEI encoding
Changed by
Mary A. Waters
Created Edition
Anna Letitia Barbauld
PRELIMINARY ESSAY
to the
SELECTIONS FROM THE SPECTATOR, &c.
Selections from the
Spectator
,
Tatler
,
Guardian
, and
Freeholder: with a
Preliminary Esssay, by Anna Lætitia Barbauld
, 3 Vols. (London: Printed for J. Johnson, St. Paul's Churchyard, by
R. Taylor and Co., Black-horse Court, Fleet Street, 1804), 1:i-xxxiv.
I
t is equally true of books as of their authors, that one
generation passeth away and another cometh. Whoever has lived long enough to compare
one race of men with that which has preceded it, will have observed a change, not
only in the tastes and habitudes of common life, but in the fashion of their studies,
and their course of general reading. Books influence manners; and manners, in return,
influence the taste for books.
Books make a silent and gradual, but a sure change in our ideas and opinions; and as
new authors are continually taking possession of the public mind, and old ones
falling into disuse, new associations insensibly take place, and shed their influence
unperceived over our taste, our
vol. i.
a
manners, and our morals. If, for instance, the parent of the last age
would put Fenelon into the hands of
his child, and the parent of the present day would give him Berquin; each with a view of impressing the
same general sentiments of piety and benevolence: yet their offspring will be pupils
of a different school, and their moral ideas will have some shades of difference.
This new infusion of taste and moral sentiment acts in its turn upon the relish for
books; and thus the fame of writers is exposed to continual fluctuation. Nor does
this remark apply only to those ephemeral publications which, either from the nature
of the subject or the mediocrity of its execution, live their day, and are then
buried in oblivion; but to books that have been the favourites of the public, and
‘the very glass by which its noble youth did dress themselves.'
Shakespeare,
Henry IV Part 2
II.iii.21-2, slightly altered. Books that were in every one's
hands, and that have contributed to form our relish for literature itself; these are
laid aside, as philosophy opens new veins of thought, or fashion and caprice direct
the taste of the public into a different channel. It is true, indeed, that a work of
the first excellence cannot perish. It will continue to be respected as a classic:
but it will no longer be the book which everyone who reads is expected
to be acquainted with, to which allusions are often made, and readily understood in
conversation; it loses the precious privilege of occupying the minds of youth: in
short, it is withdrawn from the parlour-window, and laid upon the shelf in honourable
repose. It ceases to be current coin, but is preserved like a medal in the cabinets
of the curious.
This revolution the Spectators, with the other sets of papers by the
same hands, appear to the Editor to have undergone. When those were young who now are
old, no books were so popular, particularly with the female sex. They were the
favourite volumes in a young lady's library; and probably the very first that, after
the Bible, she would have thought of purchasing. Sir Roger de Coverley and the other
characters of the club were ‘familiar in our mouths as household names;'
Shakespeare,
Henry V
IV.iii.52, altered. and every little circumstance related of them
remained indelibly engraven on our memories. From the papers of Addison we imbibed our first relish for
wit; from his criticisms we formed our first standard of taste; and from his
delineations we drew our first ideas of manners. It a 2
requires little attention to be convinced that this is now far from
being the case. It is not difficult to meet with those among the rising generation
who have only seen here and there an occasional paper of a publication once so
generally diffused; and it now and then happens that a story from the
Tatler is produced as new, in polite company, without detection.
Various causes have contributed to this change. When these periodical papers were
first published, the plan itself was new. It has since been adopted by various
writers with more or less success, till the frame-work is worn out, or, if the reader
please, till the canvas of the panorama is become threadbare. Style has also been
purified and refined. Criticism has become more profound. Essay-writing has been
largely cultivated. Moral sentiments of weight and importance have become trite from
frequent repetition. The talent also of composition is more common than it was a
century ago; and many things which were then first said have since been better said.
Add to this, that much of the wit and lively satire of these papers has been employed
on subjects of a temporary nature, and has consequently lost much of its salt and
pungency. We are no longer interested in the contest between the opera
and the puppet-show. We can only guess how much of truth and how much of invention is
contained in the account of the Mohawks; and we are less struck with the whimsical
effect of party-patching, when the mode itself is forgotten amidst newer inventions
of capricious ornament, and more modern exhibitions of fashionable folly.
It is also to be considered, that the more efficacious these pieces have been, and
no doubt they have had considerable effect, in refining the taste and correcting the
manners of society, the sooner will they be thrown by as antiquated or useless. Thus,
the very success of a book may hasten the period of its being forgotten; and the
completion of an author's purpose may turn out to be the ruin of his fame. Addison was himself aware of this cause
of a diminution of popularity, and says, in one of his essays, that those papers
which attack the follies of the day, will, in process of time, become like old plate;
the weight will remain, but the fashion will be lost.
It must however be acknowledged, that a great part of these compositions do by no
means stand upon so high a ground of merit as to have any strong claim upon the
notice of a 3
the present age. In the Tatlers there is a great deal of
absolute trifling; and the Spectators themselves, though the best of
the several sets, are very unequally written,—as indeed might be expected from the
various hands engaged in the work. Steele was an entertaining rather than a fine writer; and none of his
coadjutors (the immortal Addison alone
excepted) would now be thought much above the common run of essay-writers in a
newspaper or a magazine. Many inaccuracies and even vulgarisms blemish the pages of
Steele, which an author of less
celebrity would now avoid. We are grown more accurate in our definitions, more
discriminating in our investigations, more pure in our diction, more fastidious in
the ornaments of style; we possess standards of excellence of every kind to refer to,
books multiply on our hands, and we willingly consign to oblivion a portion of the
old, to make room for the increasing demands of the new.
This being the case, it has been thought that a Selection from the
Tatlers,
Spectators, and
Guardians, comprising all those papers in which the peculiar
spirit and excellence of these works chiefly resides, might be no unacceptable
present to the world in general, and par- ticularly to young people of both sexes, who may not happen to
possess the originals, and who, if they did, would want a guide, in so miscellaneous
a work, to direct them to what is best worth their notice. Let it not be imagined
that such a Selection is presumptuously intended to supersede the original volumes;
they must always find their place in a well-furnished library: but the generality of
readers, of whose various occupations the cultivation of literature makes only a
part, (and of this class are nearly all women, and most men who are not devoted to
professional studies,) may perhaps be well content to have some of the most beautiful
compositions in our language presented to them, without being obliged to lose their
own time in separating them from a mass of uninteresting matter. The French are very
fond of extracting what they call l'esprit d'un auteur,
which may be translated the essence of a writer. In
this, which may be compared to the essential oils of plants, resides the genuine and
distinguishing flavour of an author's wit; but it commonly bears a very small
proportion to his bulk. Whole libraries might by this process be distilled down to a
few pocket volumes; as a single phial of attar of roses
contains a 4
the precious product of many acres. Time is an admirable chymist in
this way. We are apt to lament the waste he has made among the productions of antient
genius: but it is probable, if we had an opportunity of inspecting them, we should
find that, in reality, nearly all are preserved to us that are most worth
preservation; and that what has perished is chiefly made up of the residuum of
science, and the caput mortuum of literature. It is true, indeed, that there is a
light in which papers that describe the manners and little incidents of the day, rise
in value as their contents become more obsolete. With what curiosity should we peruse
a Roman newspaper, or a critique upon Roscius, or a conversatione at the toilette of
Aspasia! To an antiquary the
Spectators are already a great source of information, and five
hundred years hence will be invaluable; though it must be observed, some discernment
is necessary to separate the playful exaggerations of humour from the real facts on
which they are grounded.
It may be proper to preface this Selection with some account of the original
publications. The Tatler was undertaken by sir Richard Steele, under the fictitious name
of Isaac Bickerstaff; which he assumed, as he tells us himself in the
dedication to the first volume, in order to take advantage of the popularity the name
had acquired from its having been made use of by Swift in his humorous predictions
relative to poor Partridge, the almanac-maker.See, for example,
Predictions for the Year 1708. Wherein the Month and Day of the Month
Are Set Down, the Persons Named, and the Great Actions and Events of Next
Year Particularly Related, as They Will Come to Pass. Written to Prevent the
People of England from Being Further Impos'd on by Vulgar Almanack-Makers.
By Isaac Bickerstaff, Esq.
(1708);
The Accomplishment of the First of Mr. Bickerstaff's Predictions: Being
an Account of the Death of Mr. Partrige, the Almanack-Maker, upon the 29th
Inst., in A Letter to a Person of Honour
(1708);
An Elegy on Mr. Partrige, the Almanack-Maker, Who Died on the 29th of
this Instant March, 1708
(1708); and
A Vindication of Isaac Bickerstaff Esq; Against What Is Objected to Him
by Mr. Partrige, in His Almanack for the Present Year 1709. By the Said
Isaac Bickerstaff, Esq
(1709). The first number was published April 12, 1709. Addison was at this time in Ireland,
secretary to Wharton the
lord-lieutenant. He is said to have discovered his friend when he got to the sixth
number, by a remark on Virgil, which he
recollected having communicated to him. From that time Addison enriched it with occasional
pieces, though he seems to have confined his assistance to loose hints and sketches
during the earlier period of the work. It is not till the second volume that we meet
with any entire paper in his best style. But the hand of Swift, who then acted with the whigs, and
was intimate with Steele, is frequently
discernible. The
Verses on a Morning in Town
; and on
A City Shower
, which are printed in his works, made their first appearance here. The
remarks on various preachers then in vogue, No. 66, contain much of the substance of
his
Letter to a Clergyman
; and the first hint and germ of his
Polite Conversation
See
A Letter from a Lay-Patron to a Gentleman, Designing
for Holy Orders
(1720) and
A Complete Collection of Genteel and Ingenious
Conversation, according to the Most Polite Mode and Method Now Used at
Court, and in the Best Companies of England. In Three Dialogues. By Simon
Wagstaff, Esq.
(1738) is evidently to be seen in the repartees of
miss Biddy and miss Sly, which, for that reason only, is inserted here. It shows what
pains Swift took with his pieces, when
we find him working up this single thought into a volume. The next year Swift left the whigs, and joined with
Mrs. Manley and others in a party paper
called the Examiner, conducted with great virulence on the other side.
The Tatler was a kind of newspaper as well as an essay: it was
published three times a week, and sold, there being then no stamp-duty, at the low
price of a penny.
Addison kept himself concealed, and was
only suspected of being one of the authors till its appearance in volumes. This
publication gave as it were the dawn and promise of its successor, the
Spectator
; and indeed there are papers in it equal in humour to any of the latter: as
the account of the freezing of words in Nova Zembla, the Court of Honour, and some
others: but, in general, the wit is local and temporary, the style negligent; and
even the strain of the graver papers rather gives the idea of a wit who lashes the
town, than an elegant moralist who instructs the world. The Tatler
abounds in personalities; to some of these the clue cannot now be reco-
vered, and of others the interest has long since been lost. Party spirit also, at the
time these papers were published, ran very high; the whigs and tories were so nearly
balanced that they maintained for some time an equal struggle, which at length ended
in the complete defeat of the whigs, the disgrace of the duke of Marlborough, and the
forming that ministry which directed the four last years of queen Anne. Steele took a decided part in favour of
the whigs, and introduced a paper against Harley, which lost him his place of Gazetteer. Weary, perhaps, of the
responsibility of a paper, of which he was now well known to be the editor, and of
being personally threatened, as he often was, for the liberties he took with living
characters, he suddenly dropped the work on January 2, 1710. It revived in two
months' time, under better auspices and with new associates, and bore the title of
the
Spectator
. Swift was by this time
completely alienated from his old friends; but his defection was more than
compensated by the regular assistance of Addison. The new plan was better concerted, the authors felt their
strength, they had experienced how popular this way of writing was capable of
becoming, and they determined to keep it free from personal satire and
party politics. This in general they did, and it was laid on the queen's table at
breakfast. It is not difficult, however, for a skilful reader to discern in the
general turn of sentiment the political complexion of the writers. The town soon
found out to whom they were obliged for their entertainment; and an elegant
compliment was paid to the Spectator in the following epigram:
When first the
Tatler
to a mute was turn'd,
Great Britain for her Censor's silence mourn'd;
Robb'd of his sprightly beams she wept the night,
Till the
Spectator
rose, and blazed as bright.
So the first man the sun's first setting view'd,
And sigh'd,—till circling day his joys renew'd;
Yet doubtful how that second sun to name,
Whether a bright successor, or the same:
So we; but now from this suspense are freed,
Since all agree, who both with judgment read,
'Tis the same sun, and does himself succeed.The poem, by Nahum Tate, was inserted at the
end of
Spectator
no. 488 (Friday, September 19, 1712). In the original, the
triple rhyme of the last three lines is emphasized with a connecting
bracket.
To estimate the good which was done by this publication, we should consider the
state of society at the time it was written. Party spirit was high and bitter, the
manners of the wits and fashionable young men were still tinctured with the
licentiousness of the court of Charles II., mixed with the
propensity to disorderly outrages and savage frolics incident to a people who were
still amused by the Bear GardenThe Bear Garden was a sort of amphitheatre
dedicated to bull-baiting, bear-baiting, prize-fighting, and similar sports. It
was attended by butchers, drovers, &c. &c.; also by people of the highest
fashion, for whom there were seats set apart, ornamented with old tapestry
hangings, the price of which was half-a-crown. Its neighbourhood was notorious for
pick-pockets and infamous women. May Fair, another place of disorderly resort, was
abolished in 1709 [Barbauld's note].
, and who had not yet been taught to bend under the yoke of a strict police.
The stage was in its meridian of genius and fashion, but disgraced by rant and
grossness, which offended the sober and excluded the strict. Men lived much in clubs,
and of course drinking was common. There was more separation than at present between
the different classes of society; and each was more strongly marked with the
peculiarities of his profession. There were learned and there were elegant women; but
manners had not received a general polish, nor had women the advantage of a general
cultivation. Genius had already attained its perfection, but the reign of taste may
be said 2
to have commenced with Addison. The coadjutors of Addison and Steele in this
work were Eustace Budgell, Tickell, Hughes author of the Siege of
Damascus, Henry Martin, Pierce bishop of Rochester, and Mr. Henry Grove, of Taunton; occasionally Mr.
Byrom, Parnell, and Pope, whose Messiah was
first published here, together with various correspondents, some known and others
unknown. Of all these Addison was the
head of gold. His merit is indeed so superior to that of his associates, that their
labours probably live to this day only by being grafted on his fame. Many of their
papers are pleasing and instructive: yet, if by any accident they were destroyed,
their loss would scarcely be felt amongst the various treasures of English
literature; whereas the loss of Addison
could not elsewhere be supplied, and would make a chasm not in the number only, but
in the species of our fine writers.
Addison was one of a cluster of men of
genius, who, flourishing at a time when the taste of the nation was forming itself,
became in their different walks the standards of literary excellence. His peculiar
portion was delicate humour, taste, and richness of imagination: these were all
enlisted on the side of virtue and good manners. In these periodical
papers he assumed the title of Censor; and no one was better qualified for so
delicate and useful an office. Decency and sobriety of behaviour are every where
inculcated: every offensive singularity, every outrage of the licentious upon the
sober and defenceless part of society, is held up to reprobation: marriage, the
constant butt of the wits and jest of the stage, is treated with just respect, and
its duties enforced. Addison says of
himself, that as Socrates made it his boast,
that he had drawn down philosophy from the gods to dwell among men, so he shall be
satisfied to have it said of him, that he had brought her from schools and colleges
to the tea-table and the dressing-room. His talents were well adapted for an
undertaking of this sort. His excellence lay not so much in the depth or extent of
his ideas, as in his pleasing manner of communicating them; in the splendour he
diffused over a serious—in the grace with which he touched a lighter subject. Addison had a large portion of the honey
of Fenelon: nourished like him with
the purest flower of classical literature, he possessed a like vivid fancy; a similar
fulness and richness of style. But he also possessed the attic salt of
Lucian: the manner of this author is so
admirably imitated in his Menippus,
"The Fable of Menippus,"
Spectator
No. 391 (Thursday, May 29, 1712). that any person with a slight
knowledge of the Greek author, might easily
be induced to believe the dialogue was really translated from that elegant
satirist.
Addison had a wonderful talent in
working up a hint, and producing a most beautiful fancy-piece from a neglected
fragment, a slight outline, or an obscure tradition. Of this, his account of the
nation of the Amazons, the Loves of Shalum and Hilpah, and the History of the Lovers'
Leap, may be given as instances. Even where the substance is borrowed, as in some of
the Eastern tales which he has condescended to illustrate; who is not struck with
their different effect as clothed in his style, and as we read them in the bald
translation of the Arabian Tales? Whatever he touches he turns to gold. If we compare
him with the most distinguished of his contemporaries (for to the most distinguished
alone can he be compared), we shall find he has more ease and simplicity than Pope, whose wit is not always free from
affectation, and whose satire is frequently splenetic, sometimes malignant. Arbuthnot and Swift had as much wit, per- haps a freer vein of humour; but Swift could not, like Addison, ally it to grace and soften it with amenity. The satire of Swift is caustic and contemptuous; that
of Addison is so sheathed in urbanity,
that it scarcely offends those whom it chastises.
To be convinced of this we need only turn our thoughts to the different effect
produced by the strictures of each upon the female sex. Both are perhaps in reality
equally severe, and by their pleasantries betray a contempt for a sex they probably
considered in a very inferior light: yet such is the charm of manner, that the
Spectator has ever been the favourite of the toilette and the
dressing-room; while it requires no common strength of mind in a lady, to overcome
the disgust excited by the supercilious harshness of the Irish Dean, and to profit by lessons
delivered with so much roughness. When Addison rallies, you see a satyr peeping over the shoulder of the Graces.
His wit is refined; it is of a kind that requires and exercises penetration in his
reader, who is to catch his meaning from the side views that are dexterously
presented to him; for the author never laughs himself. The style of Addison is pure and clear; rather diffuse
than
vol. i.
b
concentrated, and ornamented to the highest degree consistent with
good taste. But this ornament consists in the splendour of imagery, not in the
ordonnance of words; his readers will seek in vain for those sonorous cadences with
which the public ear has been familiarised since the writings of Dr. Johnson. They will find no stately
magnificence of phrase, no triads of sentences artfully balanced, so as to form a
sweep of harmony at the close of a period. His words are genuine English: he deals
little in inversions, and often allows himself to conclude negligently with a trivial
word. The fastidious ear may occasionally be offended with some colloquial phrases,
and some expressions which would not now, perhaps, be deemed perfectly accurate, the
remains of barbarisms which he more than any one had laboured to banish from good
writing; but the best judges have doubted, whether our language has not lost more
than it has gained since his time. An idiomatic style gives a truth and spirit to a
composition, that is but ill compensated by an elaborate pomp, which sets written
composition at too great a distance from speech, for which it is only the substitute.
There is perhaps a little too much of what the French call persiflage,Banter. in the manner in which
he conveys his advice to the female part of his readers: but it was the fashion of
that age to address women in a style of gallantry, under which was often concealed a
sly ridicule. Swift, in his surly way,
used to say, 'Let him fair sex it to the world's end, I
will not meddle with the Spectator.'
Jonathan Swift,
Journal to Stella
, Friday, February 8, 1711/12, altered.
The Essays of Addison are given
sometimes in sets, and sometimes in single papers, and may be thrown into different
classes: those on criticism, on moral and religious subjects, fancy pieces,
and those that exhibit character, life and manners.
From each of these, several have been chosen for the present Selection. The sets,
which for the sake of variety were originally mingled with the other papers, are here
given without interruption, for the greater convenience of the reader. Of these, the
first is the
Essay on true and false Wit
, in six papers.
Spectator
Nos. 58-63 (Monday, May 7, 1711-Saturday, May 12, 1711). These
strictures will appear particularly seasonable, if we recollect how much the taste
for point and verbal wit had prevailed in the punning reign of James the first, and among the
minor wits of the court of Charles
the second. Authors then abounded in thought, but had not yet learned what
to reject. Addi-
b 2
son has seasoned these papers with a
plentiful share of the quality in its best form, which is the subject of them. They
conclude with a well imagined allegory, which has been made the ground-work of a very
pretty mock-heroic poem by the late Mr.
Cambridge, entitled
The Scribbleriad
. The
Critique on Milton's Paradise Lost
is more elaborate, and is extended through 18 papers.The Saturday
series begins with No. 267 (Saturday, January 5, 1712) and continues through No.
369 (Saturday, May 3, 1712). For this task the author was qualified as well
by his exquisite natural taste, as by his familiar acquaintance with the Greek and
Roman classics, and the laws of composition; we may add also, by his serious and
religious turn of mind, a circumstance of no small moment in relishing a poem the
basis of which is laid in scriptural mythology. This admirable poem, which is now the
boast of every Englishman, was at that time but little noticed. Not that Addison, as some seem to think, discovered the Paradise Lost: it had been
long enough before the public to attract the notice of judges: but there had been no
large edition before his time, and many circumstances had contributed to prevent its
soon becoming a popular work. Milton's
political character was for some time obnoxious; his style had many little rough- nesses, and many scholastic terms not easily understood. His poem was in
blank verse, which was then a novelty to the English reader, as was also the nature
of the poem itself; for we had no regular epic, and the common reader was not, as
now, familiarized, through the medium of good translations, with Homer and Virgil. It was therefore a necessary preliminary, to explain the laws and
construction of epic poetry in general; after which, in a pleasing strain of liberal
and elegant criticism, the essayist goes on to illustrate the beauties of his author.
The many brilliant passages that are quoted, and brought into parallel with
corresponding ones in the antient poets, chequer the page with a pleasing variety,
and, by familiarizing the reader with the style of Milton, made way for the more general
reception of the entire poem. Such a critique has certainly less in it that suits the
present day, and therefore the editor was long in doubt whether to admit these papers
in the present Selection. They will however be found useful to young persons in
laying a basis of just taste, and older ones might have regretted the omission of
what they have been accustomed to admire. A reader of the present day will b 3
be apt to smile to see Blackmore mentioned, as he is by Addison, in the same page with Milton; but the truth is, there was a great mixture of party spirit in the
cry raised by the tory wits against the dullness of Blackmore. He was too prolific a poet;
but his
Creation
is superior to many poems which those wits thought proper to commend. Worse
authors have been promised immortality, and much better have failed to obtain it.
The next set is on the
Pleasures of the Imagination
.This daily series extends from No. 411 (Saturday, June 21, 1712)
through No. 421 (Thursday, July 3, 1712). The final paper includes brief abstracts
of each paper in the series. This piece of criticism is equally calculated
to enlighten the mind by the soundness of its rules; and to form the taste, by the
beauty of its illustrations: the language of Addison is no where more brilliant and highly finished than in some
passages of these papers. Akenside, as
is well known, made them the groundwork of his didactic poem, and had little more to
do in many parts than to reduce to measure what had already all the other charms of
poetry.See Barbauld's "Essay on
the Pleasures of the Imagination,"
The Pleasures of the Imagination
, by Mark Akenside (London:
printed for T. Cadell, junior, and W. Davies, by R. Noble, 1794) xiii-xx.
Several papers are devoted to theatrical entertainments. Such was then the
licentiousness of the playhouse, that the austere moralists condemned it altogether.
Addison did better; for he undertook
to reform it; and no doubt it is owing to the castigation which he
and other writers of taste and virtue have bestowed upon it, that it is at present
tolerably free from gross indecency, rant, and profaneness. It was then common for
ladies of character to go in a mask the first night of a new play, as they expected to be put out of countenance. Steele had a great share in this
reformation, as well by his own comedies as by his strictures on those of others.
Not content with the incidental and indirect service done to virtue and religion in
the general strain of his writings, the Saturday papers through many of the volumes
are devoted by Addison expressly to
that purpose. The sentiments of rational and liberal devotion which breathe through
them, are blended with the speculations of philosophy and the paintings of a fine
imagination. His religious affections break forth at a fine sun-set, the view of the
starry heavens, and other circumstances proper to impress a mind of feeling. Of these
a portion are presented to the reader; perhaps not so many as, upon a vague
recollection, he will imagine might have been collected: but the truth is, we abound
so much in excellent b 4
discourses of this nature, that many of them would not now appear to
be marked with that originality which is meant to form the basis of this Selection.
In one particular, we must reluctantly confess, Addison was not liberal. He had no enlarged ideas of religious toleration. He treats
Freethinkers, whom he often attacks, with a contempt and insult by no means
consistent with either the philosophy or the urbanity of his character: nay, he gives
broad hints that the civil magistrate would be well employed in hunting these vermin,
as he calls them, out of society; and talks, half in jest half in earnest, of
"blowing an atheist out of the mouth of a cannon." But Addison was, and was accustomed to call
himself, a tory in religion, though a whig in politics.
The next class may be called his Fancy Pieces, as the
Vision of Mirzah, the Mountain of Miseries,
Marathon and Yaratilda
. These are almost all such as none but himself could write. The flower of the
most elegant imagination, the visions of a poetical fancy, are blended sometimes with
sentiment, sometimes with wit and gaiety, and often are illustrative of some sublime
moral truth. In this kind of writing, particularly pleasing to young
minds, Addison has been often imitated,
but perhaps never equalled.
In the pictures of life and delineation of manners, which make up a large part of
the work, the hand of a master is not less apparent. The character of the Spectator
himself is well conceived and faithfully kept up; and that of Sir Roger de Coverley is exquisitely
drawn. It is however remarkable, that his character, as delineated in the course of
the work, is very different from the sketch of it given in the account of the club
with which the first volume of the Spectator opens: but that paper is
not Addison's, and it should seem as if
the authors had intended to make more use of those characters than they afterwards
found it convenient to do; for the greater part of them come but little into play,
and are no way essential to the conduct of the work. Sir Roger de Coverley, in the
account given of him in the first paper, is said to have been in his youth a man of
the town, a fine gentleman, to have supped with wits, blustered in coffee-houses, and
fought duels. Addison's Sir Roger is nothing of all this. He
is an honest country gentleman, ignorant of the town and the ways of
it, with a moderate share of sense, very little information, and a large portion of
what many would call salutary prejudices. By the first paper we are prepared to
expect a man whose singularities proceed from good sense and an original cast of
thought; a kind of humourist, not unlike the elder Shandy;Referring to Laurence Sterne's
Tristram Shandy
. but the singularities of Addison's Sir Roger
proceed from rusticity, and the prejudices of a confined education, operating indeed
upon a most benevolent and friendly heart. His character is set in a new light, in a
paper written by Dr. Aikin, in the
Monthly Magazine for February 1800.
"On the Humour of Addison and
the Character of Sir Roger de
Coverley,"
John Aikin,
Monthly Magazine
9.1 (February 1, 1800): 1-3.It is there observed, that this
character, though meant to be a favourite, is also meant as a vehicle of satire upon
the character of the country gentleman, which Addison has more openly held up to ridicule in the country squire of his
Freeholder: they are extremely different with regard to the
amiableness of their characters, but they have the same national and party
prejudices, and are both intended to exhibit inferiority to the more cultured
inhabitant of the town, and to fasten a ridicule upon the tory, which at that time
was the country party. In Sir Roger de
Coverley, however, this design is subservient to that of
drawing an amiable and worthy character. Sir Roger's benevolence, hospitality, piety, and honest open cheerfulness,
win our warmest affections; and if we often smile at, we always love him. The
reserved, sagacious, and thoughtful character of the Spectator
contrasts very well with the simplicity and turn for active sports of the knight.
With regard to his passion for the widow, and the effect it is said to have had upon
him, it may be doubted whether it forms a natural feature in a character like his.
Minds that expand themselves in feelings of cheerful good will, and acts of general
benevolence, and are at the same time destitute of those nicer discriminations of
taste that influence particular predilections, are perhaps not very likely to have
the colour of their whole lives affected by a hopeless passion. But Addison has had little to do with that
part of his character. Opposed to Sir
Roger is Sir Andrew Freeport, a London merchant. Trade, though rising fast,
or rather already risen into consequence, was despised by the country gentry. Addison has frequently taken occasion to
set the trading part of the community, who were nearly all whigs, in a respectable
light, and to show the connection of commerce with science and liberal principles. Many other characters, in the course of the work, are delineated with
great spirit and humour; and the Spectators are by this alone
advantageously distinguished from all the periodical papers which have succeeded
them.
Thus various are the merits of an author, whose fame can only perish with the
language in which he wrote. As a critic, it is not profound learning or metaphysical
subtlety, but exquisite taste; as a philosopher, it is not deep research, but the
happy art of unfolding an idea, and placing it in the most attractive light; as a
moralist, it is not that energy which rouses and carries away the soul in the vortex
of its own enthusiasm; nor the novelty of system, resulting from bold original ideas,
but an eloquence urbane, persuasive, and temperate, the alliance of the heart with
the imagination, which distinguishes the page of Addison. In strokes of delicate humour
and refined wit he is inexhaustible; but he has given us no instance of the pathetic,
except in his story of Theodosius and Constantia.
To the other authors of these periodical papers we are indebted for many pleasing
essays. Pierce, bishop of Rochester,
has some ingenious papers of the serious kind. The un- fortunate Budgell, the relation of Addison, wrote many papers: his style
often comes so near that of his friend and master as to do him great honour, were it
not said that Addison added so many
touches of his own as to make Budgell's property in them very doubtful. He uses the signature of X. Tickell, who in many of his works
presented a fainter reflexion of Addison, was one of the set; but his papers have no mark. Parnell wrote the vision of the Grotto of
Grief, and the Palace of Vanity. Mr. Byrom
wrote the popular piece,
My time, O ye Muses
, and some papers on dreaming. Most of the interesting stories are Steele's; and the greater part of those
papers that paint the manners of the town. Steele had a flowing pen, but his style is negligent; and though he has
endeavoured to serve the cause of virtue, particularly in his strictures on duelling,
then very common, and gaming, yet his morals have neither the dignity nor the purity
of those of his coadjutor. 'The snuffers (says bishop Latimer) should be of pure gold.'
Such was not Steele, whose weaknesses
and faults drew upon him the reprehension of his own better judgment. He was a
character vibrating between virtue and vice, but he wanted not moral
feeling. He is said to have opposed duelling, in consequence of the deep remorse he
felt from the fatal termination of a duel which he himself fought in early life with
a brother officer. Steele tells a story
with humour, but without its more delicate touches; and his style is marked by little
flippancies, and a certain air of the town. His signature is T, and sometimes R.
Those of Addison were the letters which
compose the name of the Muse Clio; which gave occasion to the elegant compliment paid
him in the following couplet:
When fainting Virtue her last effort made,
You brought your Clio to the virgin's aid.Quoted without attribution
in Samuel Johnson's
Adventurer
No. 58 (Saturday, May 25, 1753).
The Spectator continued from 1710 to 1714; that is, during the last
years of Queen Anne to the
beginning of the reign of George
the First: and during a time when all the other periodical publications were
party papers, and so bitter a spirit of animosity divided almost every company, it
was no small advantage that one paper appeared every morning the tendency of which
was of an opposite nature, and that presented subjects for conversation which men
might canvass without passion, and on which 2
they might differ without resentment. Three thousand of them were sold
daily soon after the commencement of the publication; afterwards, it is said, twenty
thousand; and it may rebuke our rage for typographical luxury to be told, that the
immortal productions of Addison were
first given to the public on a half-sheet of very coarse paper, and, before the
imposition of a stamp, for the price of one penny.
The Guardians may be considered as a kind of sequel to the
Spectators. They were in two volumes. The strain of them is
somewhat less sprightly; but they contain many excellent papers, and among them
several by Pope. The
Guardian was published in the year 1713, between the seventh and
eighth volumes of the Spectator. For what reason the authors dropped,
changed, and resumed their title in so short a space, cannot now be known. The
Guardian has, like the Spectator, a set of
characters as a frame to the work, my Lady Lizard and her sons and daughters, to whom
Nestor Ironside is the Guardian; but they are drawn with less spirit than those of
the club in the Spectator, and both have the fault of not being
necessary to the conduct of the work. It is justly observed by Dr. Johnson, that the grave
character of a Guardian, and a guardian to young ladies, is unfavourable to the
propriety of the lighter papers. What, says he, have clubs of tall and short men to
do with the education of Lady Lizard's daughters? The only set of papers in these volumes is that on pastoral poetry, written, it
should seem, by Tickell, perhaps with
the assistance of Phillips, and some
touches of Addison. They contain many
just criticisms on a species of poetry now almost obsolete, but at one period so much
in fashion, that there was hardly a poet who did not try his hand at it; till at
length it became insipid by the triteness of the sentiment, and the servile use of
the heathen mythology. The lovers of Italian poetry will by no means be satisfied to
see the beautiful poems of Aminta and Pastor Fido
Aminta
(1573) is a play by Torquato
Tasso, while
Il pastor fido
(1590) by Battista Guarini
was translated into English as
The Faithful Shepherd
(1602) by Edward Dymock. only mentioned to be found fault with; but
English readers had, at that time, little relish for the belles lettres of other
nations. The Italian language was perhaps less cultivated than in the preceding
century. Addison himself had a
sufficient portion of national prejudice, as appears whenever the French writers are
incidentally mentioned. The concluding allegory on pastoral poetry exhibits much
elegant fancy, along with a strange con- fusion in the application
of it to different writers, and the periods in which they flourished. The critique on
Pope's Pastorals by that author
himself, is remarkable for the delicacy and artful irony which imposed on the editor
of the paper, and secured its insertion, though it was, in fact, a concealed ridicule
on Phillips, whose pastorals it had
been the aim of the former papers to extol.
The Freeholder was a direct party paper, written by Addison alone, on the side of Government,
immediately after the rebellion of 1715, when perhaps one half of the nation were
Jacobites in their hearts. It can of course supply little matter for a selection of
this kind: yet a few papers are given, both as they possess genuine humour, and
because, as Addison himself remarks,
future readers may see in them the complexion of the times in which they were
written. His country squire is drawn with great humour and much effect, as the
representative of a set of men who were then almost all partisans against the court,
if not favourers of the Stuart family.
There seems to be no kind of writing which admits of selection more readily than
these pe-
vol. i.
c
riodical papers. There is no plan to interrupt, no thread of
reasoning to break. Each paper or set of papers is complete in itself; and though
many are left out which may be thought to have some claim to insertion, none, it is
hoped, are inserted which the reader of taste will wish to have been left out.
, 1804)View: HTML | XML